What core issues with the naval combat led to the reworking of the system coming in Heart of Darkness? If you have holdings on a content that a crisis is in, then you will suffer a prestige loss for not stating an interest, unless you are at war. Secondly, with the ticking system, as long as you protect your threatened territory, you can make it harder for the other side to achieve the war score to force the hand-over.Īs a Great Power, am I obligated to become involved in crises on all continents where I have holdings, or only on my home continent? However, Victoria's peace system means that you can only offer things that the AI countries have set as war goals, so as a Minor Power you will know if you run the risk of losing territory. If I am involved in a crisis as a Minor Power, and the Great Power leading my side tries to offer some of my territory to the enemy in a peace deal, is there a way I can refuse that? Or is there nothing I can really do?Ĭrisis wars are similar to normal wars in so far as the war leader gets to decide what is handed out as part of a general peace. So you could spend a lot of time burning with the world. The only down side is if you are involved in the crisis, you are automatically in the war. However, it does allow minor countries to kick off a crisis (which is what actually happened, when you think about it), and then the world could burn. The prime reason for this is to give minor countries a route to expansion. With the crisis system, we have given the ability for minor countries to encourage crisis in areas that they have cores. Will the player be able to adopt a "watch the world burn" style and try to spark a massive conflict? The new Crisis system is described as a way to kick off World War I-style conflicts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |